167 Misc. 2d 392 - Richards v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
November 2004
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q-28 Does consent contained in an antenuptial agreement ... entered into prior to marriage satisfy the consent requirements of section 401(a) 11 and 417 [of the Internal Revenue Code]? A-28 No. An agreement entered into prior to marriage does not satisfy the applicable consent requirements...." [ Richards, supra, 640 N.Y.S. 2d at 711 ; Hurwitz, supra, 982 F. 2d at 782 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.