People v. Tookes’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An alternative statutory reading would require a court to order post-judgment DNA testing on demand.... A more reasonable interpretation is that the Legislature intended that DNA testing be ordered only upon a court's threshold determination, in the context of the trial evidence, that testing results carry a reasonable potential for exculpation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“While exoneration of the wrongfully convicted should not be restricted by monetary considerations, automatic testing would impose an unnecessary burden on the state's resources in cases where the results are unlikely to have had any impact upon the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.