Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 Mont. 220 - In Re Stevenson

In Re Stevenson’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
5
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Rodriguez (1981), People in Interest of LVA (1976)

1 district · 45 state decisions

19019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Kent v. United States · Breed v. Jones · Black v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... the evidence presented at the transfer hearing was insufficient to waive jurisdiction because there was no showing that the `seriousness of the offense and the protection of the community requires treatment of the youth beyond that afforded by juvenile facilities,' as required by section 10-1229(1)(d)(ii), (now section 41-5-206(1)(d)(ii), MCA). The State argues the very nature of the offenses demonstrates the need for treatment of the youth beyond available juvenile facilities. We cannot agree. To assume that juvenile facilities are inadequate from the mere fact that the youth is charged with a serious offense, completely ignores the rehabilitative purpose of the Act as set forth in section 10-1202 (now section 41-5-102, MCA), and is tantamount to a judicial admission the juvenile facilities in Montana are inadequate to cope with the hard core youth offender. We will not do this. " (Emphasis added.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"(d) The court finds upon the hearing of all relevant evidence that there are reasonable grounds to believe that: ..... "(ii) The seriousness of the offense and the protection of the community require treatment of the youth beyond that afforded by juvenile facilities; .. ."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(d) the court finds upon the hearing of all relevant evidence that there are reasonable grounds to believe that:”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.