167 N.C. App. 412 - Dalgewicz v. Dalgewicz’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on White v. White · Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Town of Nags Head · 68 N.C. App. 548 - Alexander v. Alexander · North Carolina State Highway Commission v. Helderman · 90 N.C. App. 58 - Beightol v. Beightol
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The first step of the equitable distribution process requires the trial court to classify all of the marital and divisible property— collectively termed distributable property- — in order that a reviewing court may reasonably determine whether the distribution ordered is equitable. In fact, “to enter a proper equitable distribution judgment, the trial court must specifically and particularly classify and value all assets and debts maintained by the parties at the date of separation.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Rule 2 of the Rules of Practice, by requiring notice of the calendaring of a case, secures to a party the opportunity to prepare his case for trial and to be present for trial or to seek a continuance. Although the rule specifies that the calendar be sent to each attorney of record and that the copy of the certificate o[f] readiness be sent to opposing counsel, it is implicit in the rule that where a party is not represented by counsel he is entitled to the same notice. We note that it has long been the practice in this State that when a party to an action does not have counsel, a copy of each calendar on which his action appears calendared for trial is mailed to him at the last address available to the Clerk.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“assets, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering an unequal distribution. IV. Conclusion The trial court's order on equitable distribution is reversed and we remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 5 On remand, within 30 days after mandate issues on this opinion, either party may file a written request with the trial court for a hearing to present additional evidence or argument, and if a party files a timely request, the trial court shall hold a hearing to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.