Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 NH 338 - In re B.C.

In re B.C.’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Wolff v. McDonnell · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of formal arrest, we must determine whether [E.G.'s] freedom of movement was sufficiently curtailed by considering how a reasonable person in [E.G.'s] position would have understood the situation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “while the arrestee in [the cited case] was an adult, [B.C.] was fourteen years old at the time of her arrest, and, therefore, was more likely to feel coercive pressure as a result of her arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Custody entitling a defendant to Miranda protections requires formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with formal arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.