167 N.J. Super. 212 - Norton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1992
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Rush · Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATT · State v. Horton · State v. Senno · State in Interest of Anthony Antini, Jr.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This means, of course, as we believe the legislature fully appreciates that sufficient money must be provided at the state level to enable the Public Defender to engage sufficient personnel to man all courts expeditiously. If the appropriation made to him proves insufficient in any fiscal year, we shall have to return, for the balance of such year, to the compensation scheme set forth in Rush as to both adult and juvenile courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.