Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 N.W.2d 696 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2002

10 state decisions

7019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kulish · State v. Daves · State v. Everett · State v. Mart · Parrott v. Haugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * if a defendant is represented by counsel he must make a request or demand to enforce guarantee to speedy indictment or he shall be deemed to have waived such right”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"795.1 Failure to Indict. When a person is held to answer for a public offense, if an indictment be not found against him within thirty days, the court must order the prosecution to be dismissed, unless good cause to the contrary be shown. An accused not admitted to bail and unrepresented by legal counsel shall not be deemed to have waived the privilege of dismissal or be held to make demand or request to enforce a guarantee of speedy trial, and the court on its own motion shall carry out the provisions of this section as to dismissal."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an accused not admitted to bail and unrepresented by legal counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.