167 Ohio App. 3d 284 - In Re Graham’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2022
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Schiebel · In re Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the proof required must be clear and convincing, a reviewing court must examine the record to determine whether the trier of fact had sufficient evidence before it to satisfy the requisite degree of proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We have already determined that independent counsel for the children was not warranted, so [mother's] case was not prejudiced by her counsel's failure to request separate counsel for the children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re L.W.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.