Royal Mining Co. v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Red Rock Mental Health v. Roberts (1997), Pure Oil Co. v. State Industrial Commission (1937)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marland Production Co. v. Hogan · Union Indemnity Co. v. Saling · Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Thomas · Cameron Coal Co. v. Collopy · Graver Corporation v. State Industrial Com.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The decision of the Industrial Commission is final as'to all questions of fact, and this court is . not authorized to weigh the evidence upon which any finding of fact is based. “In an action 'to enforce compensation for an .injury to/an employee under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, where it appears that no written notice of the injury was given, as required by section 7292,'C. O. S. 192lf a want of prejudice to the employer • By reason of a failure to give the written notice sufficiently appears, where it is shown that .the employer had actual notice of such injury soon after it occurred, and, with full knowledge of the injury, omitted to administer any relief; and, where the employee makes proof of such actual noticei of his injury, the’burden -of proof then shifts to the employer 5'to show that, in spite of such actual notice,, he.is still prejudiced by the failure .to" give the written notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““When a claim, for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (St! 1931, sec. 13348 et seq.) is filed with the State Industrial Commission, it becomes the mandatory duty of such commission to make or deny an award determining such claim, and the same may be disposed of only upon some evidence or showing involving the merits thereof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.