Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 Or. 116 - Warren v. Bean

Warren v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1950
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United States · S. A. L. Ry. Co. v. R. R. Comr's. · Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Wallace · Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Corey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * Hence, a would-be carrier, seeking to set aside an order of the public utilities commissioner refusing to grant him a permit, must show by clear and satisfactory evidence that the order of the commissioner was not supported by substantial evidence or that, for some other reason, it is unlawful, unreasonable or unjustly discriminatory and, if he fails to make such a showing, the order must stand and is conclusive upon the courts. See Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co. v. Corey, 120 Or. 517, 524 , 252 P. 955 , and authorities there cited.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Here, there was a fair hearing before the commissioner. There was evidence to support his findings and no violation by him in any respect of the due process clause.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It is contrary to public policy and public interest that monopoly or monopolistic practices in motor transportation be permitted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.