Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 Or. App. 489 - State v. Sampson

167 Or. App. 489 - State v. Sampson’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
6
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2021

13 state decisions

100200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 153 Misc. 2d 139 - People v. Quinn · 158 Misc. 2d 1015 - People v. Quinn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘[controversy within the scientific community is not necessarily a ground for exclusion of scientific evidence. In deciding whether to admit scientific evidence, a court need not resolve disputes between reputable experts; the evidence may be admissible even though a dispute exists. . . . [T]he witness who testifies to an expert opinion is subject to cross-examination concerning how he or she arrived at that opinion, and ... in eliciting testimony to vitiate the opinion.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The DRE protocol has three major functions. First, it attempts to determine the existence of impairment in a driver and to determine whether that impairment is caused by alcohol or drugs. Second, it asks whether the cause of the impairment is something other than alcohol or drugs, such ás a medical condition. Third, if the impairment is caused by drugs, the DRE protocol purports to identify which drug, among seven broad categories, covered the impairment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.