Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 P.3d 192 - Brody v. Hellman

Brody v. Hellman’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2025

2 district · 18 state decisions

130200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air · Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air · Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. of Phila. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is designed to be greater than the reasonable value of the services ... to reflect the fact that attorneys will realize no return for their investment of time and expenses in cases they lose.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] party seeking costs must provide the court with sufficient information and supporting documentation to allow a judge to make a reasoned decision for each cost item presented.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “entitled to have the trial court make findings sufficient to disclose the basis for its decision to award costs and to support the amount awarded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.