Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 SO 242 - Phillips v. Gillaspie.

Phillips v. Gillaspie.’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1965
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Loranger v. Citizens' Nat. Bank · Fudickar v. Inabnet · Goldsmith v. Parsons · Goldsmith v. Parsons · Goldsmith v. Parsons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It appears, therefore, that the clear purpose of the excluded testimony was to show, not want of consideration for the issuance of the note, but that at the time the note was executed an independent agreement was entered into between the parties providing for the payment of the note in a manner different from that stipulated in the note itself.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.