A. N. E. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1976
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. J. K. · State v. Brock · In Re Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... places an unnatural and illogical duty upon the appellate court, which would rarely have before it sufficient information in the file from which to determine what papers are necessary ... [and] violates the fundamental concept of our court system and the function of a court in relation to the rights and contentions of the parties litigant. A.N.E. v. State, 167 So.2d 769, 771 (Fla.App. 1st Dist. 1964).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.