Gas v. Edmonds’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on L. B. Priester & Son v. McGee · 68 So. 3d 76 - HUGH DANCY CO., INC. v. Mooneyham · 350 So. 2d 689 - Miller Transporters v. Seay's Dependents · 925 So. 2d 893 - Duke Ex Rel. Duke v. Parker Hannifin Corp. · 749 So. 2d 342 - Hurdle and Son v. Holloway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Linde Gas cites no authority that would equate Edmonds’s actions before and during the accident to willful intent. In fact, Linde Gas did not provide any evidence that would establish that ‘Ed-monds’s lack of sleep or consumption of pain medication would have caused the accident or demonstrate a willful intent to cause injury to himself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.