167 So. 3d 71 - State v. Romious’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 924 So. 2d 1120 - State v. McCoil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I want to be very clear with regard to this area of it, sir, because I know from prior testimony in this court from the competency hearings that we have, that you do suffer from bipolar disorder. I islt appears to me you have been, while incarcerated, managed well on your medication. You appear, certainly, to be understanding all of the proceedings here today. I just want to make sure that my impression is, in fact, true that you have been, while incarcerated, been taking your medication regularly? To this question, defendant replied, ‘Tes, I have, Your Honor.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.