Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 SO3D 801 - State v. Flores

State v. Flores’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · Apodaca v. Oregon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of costs associated with sex offender registration in State ex rel. Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La. 2/21/01), 779 So.2d 735 , cert. denied, 533 U.S. 936 , 121 S.Ct. 2566 , 150 L.Ed.2d 730 (2001). In Olivieri, the defendants asserted that the sex offender registration requirement violated ex post facto prohibitions of the federal and state constitutions and that the cost of compliance with the requirement was unduly burdensome. While acknowledging that such costs could be “weighty,” the Court also recognized that such expenses are a “necessary part of the regulatory scheme,” and “that the economically harsh results of [the] well justified system of public notification is not the result of governmental action, but as a consequence of the sex offenders’ crimes.” Id. at 749 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.