In re Hall’s Empirical Analysis
167 U.S. 38 · 1897
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1962 · most notably Glidden Company v. Zdanok Lurk (1962), Cameron v. United States (1914)
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte McCardle · Ex parte Yerger · Railroad Company v. Grant · Gaines v. Caldwell George G Latta Gaines · Insurance Company v. Ritchie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The act of 13 February, 1895, 28 Stat. 664 , having been repealed by Congress, it is ordered in all suits brought under or subsequent to said act that motions for new' trial, applications for judgments and all other papers in such suits be restored to and retained upon the files of the court without further proceedings being had.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The effect of the passage of the repealing act was to take away the jurisdiction of the court of claims to proceed further in those cases which were founded upon the act thus repealed. This the congress had power to do.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“be, and the.same is hereby,-repealed, and all proceedings pending shall he vacated, and no. judgment heretofore rendered ímpursuance of said act shall he paid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.