Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 U.S. 659 - St Joseph Co v. Steele

St Joseph Co v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis

167 U.S. 659 · 1897

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2014 · most notably Ex Parte: Edward T Young (1908), Fayerweather v. Ritch (1904)

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

1701897190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on St Louis Ry Co v. James · Hanford v. Davies · Memphis v. State of Alabama · Ohio and Mississippi Railroad Company v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Not every mere allegation of the existence of a federal question in a controversy will suffice for that purpose. There must be a real substantive question, on whieh the case may be made to turn. Nor can jurisdiction be inferred argumentatively from the averments in the pleadings, but the averments should be positive. Hanford v. Davies, 163 U. S. 273 , 279 [ 16 S. Ct. 1051 , 41 L. Ed. 157 ].””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““While a railroad company owning and running a line running through several states may receive and exercise powers granted by each, and may, for many purposes, be regarded as a corporation of each, such legislation does not avail to make the same corporation a citizen of every state it passes through, within the meaning of the jurisdiction clause of the constitution of the United States.” Page 663, 167 U. S., and page 927, 17 Sup. Ct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.