Gilmore v. Thwing’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2018
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McGill v. W. P. Fuller & Co. · Olson v. Haggerty · James v. Cannell · Manhattan Quality Clothes, Inc. v. Cable · Melcher v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A garnishment is the attachment of a credit or credits, and the rule is the same whether one attaches tangible physical property by means of a -writ of attachment, or attaches credits by means of a writ of garnishment.” Gilmore v. Thwing, 167 Wash. 457 , 9 P. (2d) 775 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if the writ had been rightfully issued, its service upon the [plaintiff's] bank would have been rightful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.