¶1 (dissenting) — My conviction is that the instruction respecting “the note sued on herein” was bad, must have had a controlling influence upon the jury, and was, consequently, prejudicial. For that reason, I feel impelled to dissent.
167 Wash. 583
10 P.2d 226
Bain v. Wallace
Decided April 8, 1932
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1932-04-08
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1932-04-08
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2024
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →