Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 WASH2D 273 - State v. Iniguez

State v. Iniguez’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Loud Hawk · 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant must show that the length of the delay crossed a line from ordinary to presumptively prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`necessarily abuses its discretion by denying a criminal defendant's constitutional rights.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.