Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 WASH2D 620 - State v. Winterstein

State v. Winterstein’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Nix v. Williams · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · State v. Hendrickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “incompatible with the nearly categorical exclusionary rule under article I, section 7.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'that the right of privacy shall not be diminished by the judicial gloss of a selectively applied exclusionary remedy.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.