State v. O'Hara’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott · 88 Wash. 2d 221 - State v. Wanrow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“manifest error affecting a constitutional right.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. KNUTZ · State v. Swetz“[i]f the facts necessary to adjudicate the claimed error are not in the record on appeal, no actual prejudice is shown and the error is not manifest.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“`plausible showing by the [appellant] that the asserted error had practical and identifiable consequences in the trial of the case.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.