167 Wis. 2d 461 - State v. Lawton’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
October 1997
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · Missouri v. Hunter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we do not interpret Grady as discarding, sub silentio, the civil/criminal methodology that the Court has developed, culminating in United States v. Halper, and substituting in its place an as-yet-undefined but certainly less strict, analysis for applying the double jeopardy clause to civil penalties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“highly unlikely that the Supreme Court would depart from the well-settled principle, in multi-prosecution analysis, that 'the risk to which the [Double Jeopardy] Clause refers is not present in proceedings that are not 'essentially criminal.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519 , 528 , 95 S.Ct. 1179 , 1785 , 44 L.Ed.2d 346 (1975) (quoting Helvering v. Mitchell, [supra], 398 . . .), without explicitly saying so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.