167 Wis. 2d 504 - Gouger v. Hardtke’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Strenke v. Hogner (2005), 228 Wis. 2d 425 - Dorr v. Sacred Heart Hospital (1999)
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 136 Wis. 2d 304 - Green Spring Farms v. Kersten · 97 Wis. 2d 332 - Grams v. Boss · 62 Wis. 2d 479 - A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc. · Vera Croley, Etc. v. Matson Navigation Company, David E. Bouler v. Matson Navigation Company · 89 Wis. 2d 703 - Pachucki v. Republic Insurance Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and the party opposing the motion for summary judgment shows facts which cast doubt upon the affiant's credibility, the trier of fact must be allowed to evaluate the individual's testimony in light of the credibility of the individual and other circumstantial evidence.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Intent requires both an intent to do an act and an intent to cause injury by that act. An intent to cause injury exists where the actor subjectively intends to cause injury or where injury is substantially certain to occur from the actor's conduct.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The principal difference between negligent and intentional conduct is 'the difference in the .probability, under the circumstance known to the actor and according to common experience, that a certain consequence or class of consequences will follow from a certain act.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.