Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 W. Va. 128 - State v. Rickman

167 W. Va. 128 - State v. Rickman’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 1987
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Neil v. Biggers · 157 W. Va. 640 - State v. Thomas · 165 W. Va. 741 - State v. Craft · 159 W. Va. 909 - State v. Casdorph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether an out-of-court identification of a defendant is so tainted as to require suppression of an in-court identification a court must look to the totality of the circumstances and determine whether the identification was reliable, even though the confrontation procedure was suggestive, with due regard given to such factors as the opportunity of the witnesses to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness’ degree of attention, the accuracy of the witness’ prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation, and the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.