State v. Richared E. Ladue’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “formalistic understanding of 'silence.' " Id. at 409 , 100 S.Ct. 2180 . ¶ 10. Similarly, in State v. Ladue , we held that "the holding in Doyle does not bar cross-examination as to prior inconsistent statements made by the defendant because a defendant who voluntarily speaks after receiving Miranda warnings has not been induced to remain silent.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Jeremy Fischer

2. “the Doyle holding rests on the fundamental unfairness of implicitly assuring a suspect that his silence will not be used against him and then using his silence to impeach an explanation subsequently offered at trial”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Jeremy Fischer

3. “In such circumstances, it would be fundamentally unfair and a deprivation of due process to allow the arrested person's silence to be used to impeach an explanation subsequently offered at trial.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Jeremy Fischer