Morgan v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

cited by 49 later decisions

states following

June 2005

most recently cited

2 district · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently June 2005 · most notably Persico v. Maher (1983), Manor Development Corp. v. Conservation Commission (1980)

2 district · 47 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission · General Motors Corporation v. Mulquin · Padula v. Padula · Dempsey v. Tynan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“`Thus, the legislature recognized the primacy of the applicable federal provisions and this court must be guided by those provisions. Stated in another way, the federal statutes and regulations set a limit upon the authority of the commissioner [of the department of social services] as well as furnishing a guide to his administration of the program.' Morgan v. White, *Page 584 168 Conn. 336 , 343-44 , 362 A.2d 505 (1975).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 45 Conn. Super. Ct. 580 - Quiceno v. Dept. of Social Services · Verde v. State Dept. of Income Maintenance, No. 095907 (Oct. 28, 1991)
“(a)ll of the provisions of this chapter are extended to the medical assistance program except such provisions as are inconsistent with federal law and regulations governing title XIX of the Social Security Amendments of 1965 and this part.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Apicelli v. Comm'r, Dept. of Income Maint., No. 51 73 47 (Nov. 20, 1991) · Verde v. State Dept. of Income Maintenance, No. 095907 (Oct. 28, 1991)
“where the state sets stricter standards for eligibility than those enumerated by the pertinent federal law, the state standards are tacitly inconsistent with those federal provisions”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2578 - Hill v. Wilson-Coker, No. Cv 02 0513538 S (Feb. 18, 2003) · 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2790 - Hill v. Wilson-Coker, No. Cv 02 0513538 S (Feb. 18, 2003)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.