Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 Conn. App. 175 - Pena v. Gladstone

168 Conn. App. 175 - Pena v. Gladstone’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vinson v. Kelly · Norman v. United States · Bornemann v. Bornemann · Grimm v. Grimm · Krasnow v. Krasnow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) In any proceeding seeking relief under the provisions of this chapter ... the court may order either spouse or, if such proceedings concerns the custody, care, education visitation or support of a minor child, either parent to pay the reasonable attorney's fees of the other in accordance with their respective financial abilities and the criteria set forth in section 46b-82....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “According to the affidavit of counsel fees submitted by the plaintiff's counsel, the plaintiff had paid $22,339 and owed $41,261 as of the hearing date. The plaintiff testified that he had not asked his parents for financial assistance to pay his legal bills. There was no evidence that the plaintiff's parents were willing or able to do so. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “parties were before the court on the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees ... in which the plaintiff seeks an award of attorney's fees for counsel to represent him in the parties' continuing dispute over custody and visitation, particularly in prosecuting the plaintiff's motion for modification for joint legal custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.