168 Conn. App. 847 - State v. Collymore’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2020
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Pointer v. Texas · State v. Golding · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is clearly improper to increase a defendant's sentence based on [his or her] decision to stand on [his or her] right to put the [g]overnment to its proof rather than plead guilty .... Nevertheless, a defendant's general lack of remorse ... and refusal to accept responsibility ... for crimes of which he was convicted are legitimate sentencing considerations .... [R]eview of claims that a trial court lengthened a defendant's sentence as a punishment for exercising his or her constitutional right to a jury trial should be based on the totality of the circumstances.... [T]he burden of proof in such cases rests with the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“1. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that a prosecutor's grant of immunity to a witness for his testimony during the state's case-in-chief does not extend to the same witness' testimony when later called by the defendant as a witness?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Collymore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.