168 F. 1021
Docket No. 206.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 1909.)
Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1909-03-16
<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United State for the Southern District of New York.</p>
2 counsel of record
Relies on The Hendrick Hudson
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1909-03-16
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1966
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United State for the Southern District of New York.
¶2Olcott, Gruber, Bonynge & McManus (Harrington Putman, of counsel), for appellant.
¶3Foley & Martin, for appellee.
¶4Before LACOMBK, COXE, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
¶6A majority of the court are of the opinion that there is ¡not sufficient in the record to warrant a reversal of the decision of the .District Court. 163 Fed. 862. Decree is affirmed, with interest and costs.