Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 F.1d 612 - In re Sweeney

In re Sweeney’s Empirical Analysis

168 F. 612 · 1909

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
March 1928
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co. · In re Mammoth Pine Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Sec. 72. That neither the referee, receiver, marshal, nor trustee shall in any form or guise receive, nor shall the court allow him, any other or further compensation for his services than that expressly authorized and prescribed in this act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.