Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 F.2d 104 - In re Waite

In re Waite’s Empirical Analysis

168 F.2d 104 · 1948

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
April 1967
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on In re Selmi · In re Swenson · In re Ebert · In re Modine · In re Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We apprehend that there is no rule of patent law more firmly settled, nor any which has been more frequently stated, than the rule that this court will not allow rejected claims simply because similar claims may have been allowed by tribunals of the Patent Office in some other application, or even in the particular application under consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.