Heath v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
168 F.2d 460 · 1948
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 1955
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Markham v. Allen · Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. · Byers v. McAuley · Case of Broderick's Will · Sutton v. English
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Particular claims to or against the estate * * * may be decided in a federal court as controversies inter partes, the probate court being bound to recognize the judgment in its administration”. 6”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hurlburt v. Eno
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.