Slocum v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis
168 F.2d 627 · 1948
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2010
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Maggio v. Zeitz · Mississippi Pub Corporation v. Murphree · Cline v. Kaplan · Calvin R. Morgan v. Riverside Mills Company, C. A. Folk, T. I. Ward · Wragg v. Federal Land Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inadequacy of price so great as to shock the conscience of the court was ground for vacating a sale already confirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The question then concerns the situation where an order as entered did not express the sale intended by the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“within their respective territorial limits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Hogue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.