Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 F.3d 134 - In Re Joseph D Morrissey

In Re Joseph D Morrissey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Procunier v. Martinez · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the First Amendment, content-based restrictions on attorney speech are permissible only when they are no greater than necessary to protect an accused’s right to a fair trial or an impartial jury. See Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 413 , 94 S.Ct. 1800 , 40 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Pending Criminal Proceedings — Specific Topics,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.