Tenner v. Zurek’s Empirical Analysis
168 F.3d 328 · 1999
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Wisconsin v. Hotline Industries, Inc. (2000), Craig Garbie, et al. v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Gacy v. Page · Ustrak v. Fairman · Moore v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. · Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Republic of Palau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An order remanding the case may require payment of just costs and any actual expenses, including attorney fees, incurred as a result of the removal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[ Section] 1447(c), as amended, removed the need to show bad faith to receive attorney fees. The…district court ought to seek a fair allocation of all the costs of defending against an improper removal. By adding attorney's fees to costs which may be awarded after remand, Congress provided the statutory authorization necessary to award fees without a finding of bad faith.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Graff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.