In Re: Jesse S. Gamble, Jr.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Bucchino v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Bucchino) (2010), McDowell v. Stein (2009)
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Hall v. Finance One of Georgia Inc. · In Re Andrew S. Bland and Sonia J. Bland, Debtors. Finance One v. Andrew S. Bland and Sonia J. Bland · Das Borden Company McMillan II v. Joseph Decosimo and Company a · Matter of Deeble
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`Unless the case is dismissed, property exempted under this section is not liable during or after the case for any debt of the debtor that arose, or that is determined under section 502 of this title as if such debt had arisen, before the commencement of the case,' with certain exceptions. See 11 U.S.C. § 522 (c). `Once the property is removed from the estate [through exemption], the debtor may use it as his own.' Hall v. Finance One of Georgia, Inc. (In re Hall) , 752 F.2d 582 , 584 (11th Cir. 1985), abrogated on other grounds by Finance One v. Bland (In re Bland) , 793 F.2d 1172 , 1174 (11th Cir. 1986) ( en banc )."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]either the trustee nor any creditor objected to the Gambles’ exemption of the [real] property from the bankruptcy estate. Thus, the property became exempt. The plain language of the bankruptcy code and precedent from this court are clear that exempt property is no longer part of the bankruptcy estate, and is available for the debtor’s use.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re Ortiz-Peredo · In Re Hunton“Congress chose not to utilize more forgiving conditional language regarding exemptions. We disagree with the bankruptcy court’s disregarding clear statutory language and holding that the trustee should safeguard the exempt property ... although the bankruptcy court believes that the differences between chapters 7 and 13 warrant different results with exemptions, we cannot ignore ... the fact that chapter 13 uses the same exemptions under section 522 as chapter 7.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Graham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.