Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 F.3d 693 - Rutherford Hospital Incorporated v. Rnh Partnership

Rutherford Hospital Incorporated v. Rnh Partnership’s Empirical Analysis

168 F.3d 693 · 1999

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2014

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

70199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Varat Enterprises Inc First Union Commercial Corporation v. Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough · Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc. · Richman v. First Woman's Bank · State of Maryland · Spartan Mills v. Bank of America Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the federal bankruptcy laws, a debtor’s estate consists, inter alia, of “all legal or equitable interest of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” 11 U.S.C. § 541 (a). “The estate under § 541(a) succeeds only to those interest that the debtor had in property prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case.” In re FCX, Inc., 853 F.2d 1149 , 1153 (4th Cir. 1988).... [a] bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction does not extend to property that is not part of a debtor’s estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Wjhile it is of course true that a bankruptcy court’s order of confirmation [of a sale] “is treated as a final judgment with res judicata effect,” ... a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction does not extend to property that is not part of a debtor’s estate. See, e.g., In re Signal Hill-Liberia Ave. Ltd. Partnership, 189 B.R. 648, 652 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Va.1995) (citing cases); In re Murchison, 54 B.R. 721, 727 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Tex.1985) (citing cases).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.