Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 F.3d 795 - Indest v. Freeman Decorating, Inc.

Indest v. Freeman Decorating, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

168 F.3d 795 · 1999

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
March 2022
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2022

13 federal appellate ·

1201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. · Monge v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I cannot agree with Judge Jones's conclusion that the Supreme Court's remarkably straightforward and perfectly consistent twin opinions in [Faragher and Burlington] do not control the present caseand, indeed all cases in which the plaintiff seeks to hold his employer vicariously liable for a supervisor's sexual harassment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “hiring, firing, failing to promote, reassignment with significantly different responsibilities, or a decision causing a significant change in benefits”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “neither enjoys a quorum and thus neither writing constitutes precedent in [the Fifth] Circuit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.