Doebele v. Sprint Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (§ 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Waters v. City of Morristown · Beck v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents · Van Skiver v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plaintiff failed to show that defendant's offered reasons for her termination were false or unworthy of belief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“abundant and uncontroverted independent evidence that no discrimination had occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.