168 Ind. App. 653 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““In an action pursuant to section 3(a) [subsection (a) of 31-1-11.5-3], the court shall divide the property of the parties, whether owned by either spouse prior to the marriage, acquired by either spouse in his or her own right after the marriage and prior to final separation of the parties, or acquired by their joint efforts, in a just and reasonable manner, either by division of the property in kind, or by setting the same or parts thereof over to one (1) of the spouses and requiring either to pay such sum as may be just and proper, or by ordering the sale of the same under such conditions as the court may prescribe and dividing the proceeds of such sale. “In determining what is just and reasonable the court shall consider the following factors: “(a) the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition of the property, including the contribution of a spouse as homemaker; “(b) the extent to which the property was acquired by each spouse prior to the marriage or through inheritance or gift; “(c) the economic circumstances of the spouse at the time the disposition of the property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family residence or the right to dwell therein for such periods as the court may deem just to the spouse having custody of any children; “(d) the conduct of the parties during the marriage as related to the disposition or dissipation of their property; “(e) the earnings or earning ability of the parties as related to a final division of ”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Irwin v. Irwin

2. “is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the court .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 180 Ind. App. 242 - Libunao v. Libunao