168 Ind. App. 68 - Day v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1999
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. a & P Trucking Co. · 129 Ind. App. 631 - Meade Electric Co., Etc. v. Hagberg Etc. · United States of America v. Adams Express Company · 106 Ind. App. 195 - Popovich v. Yugoslav National Home Society, Inc. · Shunk v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State urges a statutory construction which would impose the duty of filing a statement of expenses upon all officers and all members of the association with knowledge of payments made or expenses incurred for a legislative agent. This we cannot do. The statute is not ambiguous. The statute clearly imposes the duty on the association as a separate entity — not on the officers or members of the association.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wurster v. State““The legislature has recognized the separate existence of an association for the purpose of imposing a duty upon the association to file a statement of expenses * * *.” Day v. State, 1976, Ind.App., 341 N.E.2d 209 at 212 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.