Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 KAN 270 - Brown v. Pugh

Brown v. Pugh’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2014

24 state decisions

20019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woltz v. First Trust Co. · Dixon v. Fluker · Meador v. Manlove · Johnson v. Soden · Smith v. Nyburg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There being no appeal from the trial court’s order overruling respondent’s demurrer to claimant’s evidence, it is not a proper matter for review by this court.” (p. 275.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.