Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 Md. App. 1 - Maxwell v. State

168 Md. App. 1 - Maxwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · New York v. Ferber · Lawrence v. Texas · Doe v. Poritz · In re Geschke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One cannot get a clear picture ... without an understanding of internet chat rooms and instant messaging, two relatively recent forms of electronic communication____[A]n internet chat room... is not a place, per se, but, [is] instead a method for anyone with a computer and a connection to the internet to converse — instantly — with others similarly equipped about a common interest. Chat room conversations appear as text on a computer screen, with the participants’ screen names followed by the text of their conversations. . . . Chat rooms often have moderators and can thus be monitored; in addition, chat rooms are designed to facilitate conversations among large groups of people .... For these reasons, once the electronic chats between two “chatters” turn to specific content where privacy . . . becomes a concern, they then turn to an instant messaging service — a two-way instantaneous text communication similar to a chat room — but with no one to monitor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.