Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 168 N.C. 402 - Singleton v. . Cherry

Singleton v. . Cherry’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1971
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1971

8 state decisions

201915192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The other deed of Cornelia Cherry to her husband, under which the defendants claim, has the ordinary privy examination in due form, but the provisions of Revisal, (587) section 2107, have not been complied with. This section requires certain findings and conclusions of the probate officer to be made with reference to contracts between the wife and husband in relation to her separate property. While the act of 1911, chapter 109, known as the Martin Act, provides that a married woman may contract and deal so as to affect her real and personal property as if she were a feme sole , it excepts contracts between herself and her husband. We are of opinion that in a conveyance of the landed estate of a wife by herself to her husband, the requirements of section 2107 must be observed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We do not think that the Martin Act intended, in such a transaction between the husband and wife, (588) that the safeguards provided by the statute for the protection of married women should be set aside.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.