168 N.C. App. 515 - Johnson v. Lucas’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
68 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Lennie v. Profile Products, LLC (2007), 198 N.C. App. 274 - Hoke County Board of Education v. State (2009)
68 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc. · 115 N.C. App. 377 - Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint Venture · Goldston v. American Motors Corp. · Sharpe v. Worland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen an appeal is interlocutory, the appellant must include in its statement of grounds for appellate review 'sufficient facts and argument to support appellate review on the ground that the challenged order affects a substantial right.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where the appellant fails to carry the burden of making such a showing to the court, the appeal will be dismissed.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is not the duty of this Court to construct arguments for or find support for appellant's right to appeal from an interlocutory order....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.