In Re L.W.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably DiPino v. Davis (1999), State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hunter (Slip Opinion) (2014)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper Arlington · 74 Ohio App. 3d 788 - James A. Keller, Inc. v. Flaherty · 84 Ohio App. 373 - Culver v. City of Warren · 145 Ohio St. 5 - Caprita v. Caprita · 117 Ohio App. 374 - In Re Darst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Actions are moot 'when they are or have become fictitious, colorable, hypothetical, academic or dead. The distinguishing characteristic of such issues is that they involve no actual genuine, live controversy, the decision of which can definitely affect existing legal relations.'”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he mootness exception for cases that are capable of repetition, yet evading review applies only in exceptional circumstances, when these two factors are both present: (1) the challenged action is too short in its duration to be fully litigated before its cessation or expiration and (2) there is a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party will be subject to the same action again.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'(1) an issue that is capable of repetition, yet evades review, or (2) a debatable constitutional question yet to be resolved or issues concerning a matter of great public or general interest.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Craig v. Gilchrist
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.