State v. Castaneda’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2022
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 140 Ohio App. 3d 326 - State v. Martin · 34 Ohio App. 3d 33 - State v. Williams · 135 Ohio App. 3d 297 - State v. Gears · State v. Kreischer · State v. Church
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thus, on remand, we note that the Griffiths are not entitled to reimbursement from appellant for any damage to their door that was paid for by their insurance carrier. [Footnote 2]. {¶ 29}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.